mixed-methods ux research
Privacy, security, and national public health data: domains where getting the research wrong has real consequences. I turn evidence into actionable decisions for teams.
privacy & security
A qualitative research study on e-proctoring: examining how being watched during exams changes student behaviour and trust, and what privacy-respecting assessment could look like.
CHORUS Lab, Carleton University · SOUPS 2022 Distinguished Poster · EuroUSEC 2023 · TOCHI (under review)
public health data visualiizations
UX research conducted inside Canada's national health-data authority, where different user persona workflows all had to be held at once.
Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) · UX Research Analyst, 2023
tangible interaction
Research through building: a physical, tangible user interface designed, prototyped, and evaluated as part of an HCI master's.
M.A. Human-Computer Interaction, Carleton University
behavioural research
An empirical psychology thesis: the foundation of how I design studies, reason about evidence, and handle data with care.
Hon. B.A. Psychology, University of Waterloo
I work where the stakes are real, and that changes how research gets done.
Sensitive data, regulated environments, and people in vulnerable positions don't tolerate sloppy method. My background is mixed-methods: interviews and qualitative analysis sit alongside survey design and quantitative work, and I'm comfortable moving between them depending on what the question needs.
The output that matters isn't a report — it's a decision a team makes differently. Every study below is framed around what changed because the research existed.