write this lastOne or two sentences: what was the project, and what changed because of your research? Write it last, once the study below is clear.
The situation
promptWhat is Protea-Type, and what question about tangible interaction motivated it? Set up why a physical prototype was the right way to investigate it.
What I set out to answer
promptThe research/design question the artifact was built to probe. Tangible-interaction work is strongest when the object is an argument, not just a gadget — what claim does it test?
What I actually did
promptHow you built it (materials, fabrication, iterations) and how you evaluated it (who tried it, what you observed, how you analysed it). This case shows you can build, which sets you apart from research-only candidates — be concrete about the making.
What we found
prompt — 2 to 4 findingsWhat the prototype revealed — about the interaction, about users, about your hypothesis. Include what surprised you. Photos or short clips strengthen each finding.
What changed
promptWhat the work contributed: to the course, to your understanding of tangible UX, to any follow-on. Honest about scope.
What I'd carry forward
promptLimitations honestly stated, what you'd do differently, and what the work taught you as a researcher.